Testing of support tools for plagiarism detection
- Tomas Foltynek(corresponding author),
- Dita Dlabolova,
- Alla Anohina-Naumeca,
- Salim Razi,
- Julius Kravjar,
- Laima Kamzola
- University of Wuppertal,
- Mendel University in Brno,
- Riga Technical University,
- Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University,
- Slovak Centre for Scientific and Technical Information,
Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-reviewOpen access
Publication metrics
Metrics
SciVal
FWCI
3.21
SciVal
Author count
9
SciVal
Paper percentile
94
SciVal
Citations
93
SciVal
Top percentile
10
PlumX, opens in new tab
Citations
96
Mentions
5
Captures
260
Social media
58
Abstract
There is a general belief that software must be able to easily do things that humans find difficult. Since finding sources for plagiarism in a text is not an easy task, there is a wide-spread expectation that it must be simple for software to determine if a text is plagiarized or not. Software cannot determine plagiarism, but it can work as a support tool for identifying some text similarity that may constitute plagiarism. But how well do the various systems work? This paper reports on a collaborative test of 15 web-based text-matching systems that can be used when plagiarism is suspected. It was conducted by researchers from seven countries using test material in eight different languages, evaluating the effectiveness of the systems on single-source and multi-source documents. A usability examination was also performed. The sobering results show that although some systems can indeed help identify some plagiarized content, they clearly do not find all plagiarism and at times also identify non-plagiarized material as problematic.
Publication Information
Output type
Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-reviewOriginal language
EnglishArticle number
46Pages from-to (Number of pages)
Pages 1-31 (31 pages)Journal (Volume, Issue Number)
RUSC Universities and Knowledge Society Journal (Volume 17, Issue 1)Publication milestones
- Published - 01/12/2020
Publication status
Published - 01/12/2020
Publication IDs
- Scopus: 85088576086
Funding Details
We are deeply indebted to the contributions made to this investigation by the following persons: ● Gökhan Koyuncu and Nil Duman from the Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University (Turkey) uploaded many of the test documents to the various systems; ● Jan Mudra from Mendel University in Brno (Czechia) contributed to the usability testing, and performed the testing of the Czech language set; ● Caitlin Lim from the University of Konstanz (Germany) contributed to the literature review; ● Pavel Turčínek from Mendel University in Brno (Czechia) prepared the Czech language set; ● Esra Şimşek from the Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University (Turkey), helped in preparing the English language set; ● Maira Chiera from University of Calabria (Italy) prepared the Italian language set; ● Styliani Kleanthous Loizou from the University of Nicosia (Cyprus) contributed to the methodology design; ● We wish to especially thank the software companies that provided us access to their systems free of charge and patiently extended our access as the testing took much more time than originally anticipated. ● We also wish to thank the companies that sent us feedback on an earlier version of this report. We are not able to respond to every issue raised, but are grateful for them pointing out areas that were not clear. A pre-print of this paper has been published on Arxiv: http://arxiv.org/abs/2002.04279
FundersFunding numbers
ÇOMÜ
-UNICAL
-MENDELU
-Universität Konstanz
-UNIC
-