Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Repeatability and comparability of anterior segment biometry obtained by the Sirius and the Pentacam analyzers

  • Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social
    ,
  • Destellos de Luz Non-profit Foundation
    ,
  • Institute for Sight Preservation
    ,
  • University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
    ,
  • Instituto Nacional de Salud Publica
Research Output: Contribution to journal Article Peer-review

Publication metrics

Metrics

SciVal
Citations
50
SciVal
FWCI
3.39
SciVal
Author count
3
SciVal
Paper percentile
94
SciVal
Top percentile
10
Scopus
Citations

Abstract

To assess the repeatability and comparability of six anterior segment biometry parameters obtained with a novel Scheimpflug camera with a Placido disc topographer (Sirius) and slit-scanning tomography with a Scheimpflug camera (Pentacam), in a sample of 16 unoperated eyes of healthy subjects. The anterior segment was analyzed by a single examiner using the Sirius and the Pentacam analyzers. Mean simulated keratometry (Sim K), flat and steep axis keratometry (K f and K s ), central and thinnest corneal thicknesses (CCT and TCT), and anterior chamber depth (ACD) measurements were evaluated. Repeatability of three sets of measurements from each device was assessed using the coefficient of variation (CV), within-subject standard deviation, and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Bonferroni-adjusted t-tests, and Bland and Altman plots were used to establish agreement between devices. For both devices the CV of repeated measurements was <0.79 %. The ICC was >0.95 in all measurements except for Sirius K s (ICC = 0.869). For all parameters evaluated, the Pentacam systematically yielded higher values, although differences were statistically significant in only three parameters-0.31 diopters for K s , 10.1 μm for CCT and 12.4 μm for TCT. In the assessment of normal corneas both devices showed overall high repeatability. Although good agreement was found in three parameters (Sim K, K f and ACD) these devices do not seem to be interchangeable for pachymetric determination.

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output: Contribution to journal Article Peer-review

Original language

English

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 27-33 (7 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

International Ophthalmology (Volume 34, Issue 1)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 02/2014

Publication status

Published - 02/2014

ISSN

0165-5701

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 84895789736
  • WOS: 000331713700005