Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Intestinal Microbiome Changes in Fecal Microbiota Transplant (FMT) vs. FMT Enriched with Lactobacillus in the Treatment of Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection

  • Elvira Garza-González
    ,
  • ,
  • Rayo Morfin-Otero
    ,
  • Andrea Ramírez-Fontes
    ,
  • Patricia Rodríguez-Zulueta
    ,
  • Samantha Flores-Treviño
  • Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Facultad de Medicina, Hospital Universitario "Dr. José Eleuterio González", Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico.
    ,
  • Hospital Civil de Guadalajara, Fray Antonio Alcalde, and Instituto de Patología Infecciosa y Experimental, Centro Universitario de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Jalisco Mexico.
    ,
  • Infectious Diseases Service, Hospital General Manuel Gea González, Ciudad de Mexico, Mexico.
Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Publication metrics

Metrics

SciVal
FWCI
0.68
SciVal
Author count
9
SciVal
Citations
17
SciVal
Paper percentile
61
Scopus
Citations

PlumX, opens in new tab

Captures
83
Citations
18

Abstract

Aim: In this study, we conducted a comparative study to explore the differences in therapeutic efficacy and intestinal microbiome of fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) vs. FMT in addition with Lactobacillus (FMT-L) for treatment of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (R-CDI).

Methods: We designed a double-blinded randomized comparative two-arm pilot multicenter study to assess the efficacy and impact in the intestinal microbiome of standard capsules of FMT vs. FMT-L enriched with 3 species of Lactobacillus for patients with R-CDI. A 90-day follow-up of 21 patients was performed, starting at the beginning of the study. From the selected patients, fecal samples were obtained at days 0, 3, 7, and 28 after treatment. Fecal samples and FMT were analyzed by 16S rRNA sequencing.

Results: We included 21 patients (13 in the FMT group and 8 in the FMT-L group). Overall, both groups had a reduction in bowel movements per day, from 8.6 to 3.2 in the first 48 h (62.7% reduction, p=0.001). No severe adverse reactions or recurrences were recorded. Firmicutes were the most abundant phylum in donors. A low relative abundance of Proteobacteria was detected and mostly found in patients even at higher proportions than the donor. The donor's pool also had relatively few Bacteroidetes, and some patients showed a higher abundance of this phylum. Based on the ANOSIM R values, there is a significant difference between the microbial communities of basal samples and samples collected on day 7 (p=0.045) and at day 28 (0.041).

Conclusion: Fecal microbiota transplant by capsules was clinically and genomically similar between traditional FMT and enriched FMT with Lactobacillus spp. Restoration of bacterial diversity and resolution of dysbiosis at days 7 and 28 were observed. Patients with a first episode of recurrence treated with FMT had an excellent response without severe adverse events; FMT should be considered as an early treatment during R-CDI.

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English

Article number

4549298

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 4549298

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Volume 2019)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 2019

Publication status

Published - 2019

ISSN

2291-2789

Publication IDs

  • PubMed: 31976311
  • Scopus: 85078171174