Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Effective evaluation of the FRIENDS anxiety prevention program in school settings: A response to Maggin and Johnson: A response to Maggin and Johnson

*Corresponding author for this work
  • Australian National University
    ,
  • University of Bath
    ,
  • Brazilian Institute of Emotional and Social Intelligence
    ,
Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
Citations
SciVal
FWCI
0.45
SciVal
Author count
5
SciVal
Citations
6
SciVal
Paper percentile
51

Abstract

© 2017, West Virginia University Press. All rights reserved. This response aims to critically evaluate the methodology and aims of the meta-analytic review written by Maggin and Johnson (2014). The present authors systematically provide responses for each of the original criticisms and highlight concerns regarding Maggin and Johnson’s methodology, while objectively describing the current state of evidence of the FRIENDS programs. The studies utilized for this response were conducted across cultural backgrounds and incorporated the most up-to- date methodology in prevention research. In review of the original article, this article raises concerns regarding the definition of prevention and risk, article identification and evaluation procedures, as well as overall methodology. Finally, it provides suggestions for future research in prevention and early intervention fields.

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 97-110 (14 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Education and Treatment of Children (Volume 40, Issue 1)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 01/02/2017

Publication status

Published - 01/02/2017

ISSN

0748-8491

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85015731420
  • Scopus: 85015731420