National Action Plans on Business and Human Rights: Progress or Mirage?

Producción científicarevisión exhaustiva

32 Citas (Scopus)


As of October 2018, 21 states have adopted National Action Plans on Business and Human Rights (NAPs), with several more in different phases of development. This is an important political step to raise awareness of the importance of intragovernmental policy coherence and of the need to move forward to prevent human rights abuses linked to business activity. However, despite the global intergovernmental support to such policy strategies, the actual effectiveness of NAPs needs to be called into question: Do they represent progress, or are they a mirage to block possible avenues of development? Currently existing NAPs have done little (yet) to ensure more effective protection in key policy areas, including trade and investment, state-owned enterprises, and particularly in relation to legislative developments and access to remedy. This contribution seeks to analyse the merits of developing NAPs, the importance of ensuring they become only the very first step towards a more effective protection of human rights, and to question whether their importance needs to be adjusted to what they really are: Policy tools with limited effects and with a politically linked time frame.

Idioma originalEnglish
Páginas (desde-hasta)213-237
Número de páginas25
PublicaciónBusiness and Human Rights Journal
EstadoPublished - jul 2019

Nota bibliográfica

Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Cambridge University Press.

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Gestión internacional y de empresa
  • Relaciones laborales
  • Sociología y ciencias políticas
  • Derecho


Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'National Action Plans on Business and Human Rights: Progress or Mirage?'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto