Influencia de la discusión subgrupal en el desarrollo de la aptitud de lectura crítica de documentos de investigación.

Norberto Elizaldi-Lozano, Myriam Insfrán-Sánchez, Héctor Cobos-Aguilar

Resultado de la investigaciónrevisión exhaustiva

Resumen

OBJECTIVE: To compare a three steps (3S) vs. two steps (2S) active participative promoting strategies (APPS) in critical reading of research papers in first degree residents. METHODS: An APPS educational intervention in 3S vs. 2S was developed. Two groups by simple random technique were study. The experimental group (A) with 13 residents and a control group (B) with 12. Three indicators were use (interpretation, judgement and proposal). The instrument had 120 items. In both groups, the educational strategies used were similar in contents. In-group A (3S) the subgroup discussion was emphasized. Group discussion and the resolution of extra classroom item guides performed was similar in both groups. Non parametric statistical tests were performed by a blind researcher. RESULTS: The reliability of the instrument was 0.89 by Kuder-Richardson procedure. The initial results were very low and showed an increase in the median in both groups. More students in-group A were located out of a random category. In both groups, Mc Nemar test results were significant. CONCLUSIONS: The 3S strategy is better than 2S in developing critical reading in research papers.

Título traducido de la contribuciónInfluence of sub-group discussion on the developing skills for critical reading of research papers
Idioma originalSpanish
Páginas (desde-hasta)439-444
Número de páginas6
PublicaciónRevista médica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social
Volumen47
N.º4
EstadoPublished - 2009
Publicado de forma externa

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Medicina (todo)

Huella

Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Influencia de la discusión subgrupal en el desarrollo de la aptitud de lectura crítica de documentos de investigación.'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto