Gender, argumentation and inference in Mexican political and media discourse

Olga Nelly Estrada, Griselda Zárate

Resultado de la investigación

Resumen

This paper aims to identify the inferential processes in argument production in Mexican media and political discourse from a theoretical interdisciplinary perspective including gender studies, argumentation theory. According to gender studies theorist, Gayle Rubin (1986) the concept of being a woman and to act in political scenarios is more criticized in a sex-gender culture. The study also incorporates an integrated operative model of argumentation (Zárate 2012, 2015), which contains logical, emotional, visceral and kisceral modes, drawing from Toulmin, Rieke and Janik (1979) and Gilbert (1997).
Idioma originalEnglish
Título de la publicación alojadaArgumentation and Inference: Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Argumentation, Fribourg 2017
EditoresSteve Oswald, Didier Maillat
EditorialCollege Publications
Páginas287
Número de páginas296
Volumen2
ISBN (versión impresa)978-1-84890-284-8
EstadoPublished - 2018

Serie de la publicación

NombreStudies in Logic and Argumentation

Huella Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Gender, argumentation and inference in Mexican political and media discourse'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

  • Citar esto

    Estrada, O. N., & Zárate, G. (2018). Gender, argumentation and inference in Mexican political and media discourse. En S. Oswald, & D. Maillat (Eds.), Argumentation and Inference: Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Argumentation, Fribourg 2017 (Vol. 2, pp. 287). (Studies in Logic and Argumentation). College Publications.