Gender, argumentation and inference in Mexican political and media discourse

Olga Nelly Estrada, Griselda Zárate

Resultado de la investigación

Resumen

This paper aims to identify the inferential processes in argument production in Mexican media and political discourse from a theoretical interdisciplinary perspective including gender studies, argumentation theory. According to gender studies theorist, Gayle Rubin (1986) the concept of being a woman and to act in political scenarios is more criticized in a sex-gender culture. The study also incorporates an integrated operative model of argumentation (Zárate 2012, 2015), which contains logical, emotional, visceral and kisceral modes, drawing from Toulmin, Rieke and Janik (1979) and Gilbert (1997).
Idioma originalEnglish
Título de la publicación alojadaArgumentation and Inference: Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Argumentation, Fribourg 2017
EditoresSteve Oswald, Didier Maillat
EditorialCollege Publications
Páginas287
Número de páginas296
Volumen2
ISBN (versión impresa)978-1-84890-284-8
EstadoPublished - 2018

Serie de la publicación

NombreStudies in Logic and Argumentation

Huella dactilar

gender studies
argumentation
discourse
gender
scenario

Citar esto

Estrada, O. N., & Zárate, G. (2018). Gender, argumentation and inference in Mexican political and media discourse. En S. Oswald, & D. Maillat (Eds.), Argumentation and Inference: Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Argumentation, Fribourg 2017 (Vol. 2, pp. 287). (Studies in Logic and Argumentation). College Publications.
Estrada, Olga Nelly ; Zárate, Griselda. / Gender, argumentation and inference in Mexican political and media discourse. Argumentation and Inference: Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Argumentation, Fribourg 2017 . editor / Steve Oswald ; Didier Maillat. Vol. 2 College Publications, 2018. pp. 287 (Studies in Logic and Argumentation).
@inbook{03b2d0cbeca54f1c82ad0b9202f8cc12,
title = "Gender, argumentation and inference in Mexican political and media discourse",
abstract = "This paper aims to identify the inferential processes in argument production in Mexican media and political discourse from a theoretical interdisciplinary perspective including gender studies, argumentation theory. According to gender studies theorist, Gayle Rubin (1986) the concept of being a woman and to act in political scenarios is more criticized in a sex-gender culture. The study also incorporates an integrated operative model of argumentation (Z{\'a}rate 2012, 2015), which contains logical, emotional, visceral and kisceral modes, drawing from Toulmin, Rieke and Janik (1979) and Gilbert (1997).",
author = "Estrada, {Olga Nelly} and Griselda Z{\'a}rate",
year = "2018",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-1-84890-284-8",
volume = "2",
series = "Studies in Logic and Argumentation",
publisher = "College Publications",
pages = "287",
editor = "Steve Oswald and Didier Maillat",
booktitle = "Argumentation and Inference: Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Argumentation, Fribourg 2017",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

Estrada, ON & Zárate, G 2018, Gender, argumentation and inference in Mexican political and media discourse. En S Oswald & D Maillat (eds.), Argumentation and Inference: Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Argumentation, Fribourg 2017 . vol. 2, Studies in Logic and Argumentation, College Publications, pp. 287.

Gender, argumentation and inference in Mexican political and media discourse. / Estrada, Olga Nelly; Zárate, Griselda.

Argumentation and Inference: Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Argumentation, Fribourg 2017 . ed. / Steve Oswald; Didier Maillat. Vol. 2 College Publications, 2018. p. 287 (Studies in Logic and Argumentation).

Resultado de la investigación

TY - CHAP

T1 - Gender, argumentation and inference in Mexican political and media discourse

AU - Estrada, Olga Nelly

AU - Zárate, Griselda

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - This paper aims to identify the inferential processes in argument production in Mexican media and political discourse from a theoretical interdisciplinary perspective including gender studies, argumentation theory. According to gender studies theorist, Gayle Rubin (1986) the concept of being a woman and to act in political scenarios is more criticized in a sex-gender culture. The study also incorporates an integrated operative model of argumentation (Zárate 2012, 2015), which contains logical, emotional, visceral and kisceral modes, drawing from Toulmin, Rieke and Janik (1979) and Gilbert (1997).

AB - This paper aims to identify the inferential processes in argument production in Mexican media and political discourse from a theoretical interdisciplinary perspective including gender studies, argumentation theory. According to gender studies theorist, Gayle Rubin (1986) the concept of being a woman and to act in political scenarios is more criticized in a sex-gender culture. The study also incorporates an integrated operative model of argumentation (Zárate 2012, 2015), which contains logical, emotional, visceral and kisceral modes, drawing from Toulmin, Rieke and Janik (1979) and Gilbert (1997).

M3 - Chapter (peer-reviewed)

SN - 978-1-84890-284-8

VL - 2

T3 - Studies in Logic and Argumentation

SP - 287

BT - Argumentation and Inference: Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Argumentation, Fribourg 2017

A2 - Oswald, Steve

A2 - Maillat, Didier

PB - College Publications

ER -

Estrada ON, Zárate G. Gender, argumentation and inference in Mexican political and media discourse. En Oswald S, Maillat D, editores, Argumentation and Inference: Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Argumentation, Fribourg 2017 . Vol. 2. College Publications. 2018. p. 287. (Studies in Logic and Argumentation).