Fault detection and diagnosis in a heat exchanger

Juan C. Tudon Martinez, Ruben Morales-Menendez, Luis E. Garza Castañon

Resultado de la investigación

2 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

A comparison between the Dynamic Principal Component Analysis (DPCA) method and a bank of Diagnostic Observers (DO) under the same experimental data from a shell and tube industrial heat exchanger is presented. The comparative analysis shows the performance of both methods when sensors and/or actuators fail. Different metrics are discussed (i.e. robustness, quick detection, isolability capacity, explanation facility, false alarm rates and multiple faults identifiability). DO showed quicker detection for sensor and actuator faults with lower false alarm rate. Also, DO can isolate multiple faults. DPCA required a minor training effort; however, it cannot identify two or more sequential faults.
Idioma originalEnglish
Páginas265-270
Número de páginas6
EstadoPublished - 1 dic 2009
Publicado de forma externa
EventoICINCO 2009 - 6th International Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics, Proceedings -
Duración: 1 dic 2009 → …

Conference

ConferenceICINCO 2009 - 6th International Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics, Proceedings
Período1/12/09 → …

Huella dactilar

Fault detection
Principal component analysis
Failure analysis
Heat exchangers
Actuators
Sensors

Citar esto

Tudon Martinez, J. C., Morales-Menendez, R., & Garza Castañon, L. E. (2009). Fault detection and diagnosis in a heat exchanger. 265-270. Papel presentado en ICINCO 2009 - 6th International Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics, Proceedings, .
Tudon Martinez, Juan C. ; Morales-Menendez, Ruben ; Garza Castañon, Luis E. / Fault detection and diagnosis in a heat exchanger. Papel presentado en ICINCO 2009 - 6th International Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics, Proceedings, .6 p.
@conference{b211f0dba8b04f4489c883bc7684d04b,
title = "Fault detection and diagnosis in a heat exchanger",
abstract = "A comparison between the Dynamic Principal Component Analysis (DPCA) method and a bank of Diagnostic Observers (DO) under the same experimental data from a shell and tube industrial heat exchanger is presented. The comparative analysis shows the performance of both methods when sensors and/or actuators fail. Different metrics are discussed (i.e. robustness, quick detection, isolability capacity, explanation facility, false alarm rates and multiple faults identifiability). DO showed quicker detection for sensor and actuator faults with lower false alarm rate. Also, DO can isolate multiple faults. DPCA required a minor training effort; however, it cannot identify two or more sequential faults.",
author = "{Tudon Martinez}, {Juan C.} and Ruben Morales-Menendez and {Garza Casta{\~n}on}, {Luis E.}",
year = "2009",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English",
pages = "265--270",
note = "ICINCO 2009 - 6th International Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics, Proceedings ; Conference date: 01-12-2009",

}

Tudon Martinez, JC, Morales-Menendez, R & Garza Castañon, LE 2009, 'Fault detection and diagnosis in a heat exchanger', Papel presentado en ICINCO 2009 - 6th International Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics, Proceedings, 1/12/09 pp. 265-270.

Fault detection and diagnosis in a heat exchanger. / Tudon Martinez, Juan C.; Morales-Menendez, Ruben; Garza Castañon, Luis E.

2009. 265-270 Papel presentado en ICINCO 2009 - 6th International Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics, Proceedings, .

Resultado de la investigación

TY - CONF

T1 - Fault detection and diagnosis in a heat exchanger

AU - Tudon Martinez, Juan C.

AU - Morales-Menendez, Ruben

AU - Garza Castañon, Luis E.

PY - 2009/12/1

Y1 - 2009/12/1

N2 - A comparison between the Dynamic Principal Component Analysis (DPCA) method and a bank of Diagnostic Observers (DO) under the same experimental data from a shell and tube industrial heat exchanger is presented. The comparative analysis shows the performance of both methods when sensors and/or actuators fail. Different metrics are discussed (i.e. robustness, quick detection, isolability capacity, explanation facility, false alarm rates and multiple faults identifiability). DO showed quicker detection for sensor and actuator faults with lower false alarm rate. Also, DO can isolate multiple faults. DPCA required a minor training effort; however, it cannot identify two or more sequential faults.

AB - A comparison between the Dynamic Principal Component Analysis (DPCA) method and a bank of Diagnostic Observers (DO) under the same experimental data from a shell and tube industrial heat exchanger is presented. The comparative analysis shows the performance of both methods when sensors and/or actuators fail. Different metrics are discussed (i.e. robustness, quick detection, isolability capacity, explanation facility, false alarm rates and multiple faults identifiability). DO showed quicker detection for sensor and actuator faults with lower false alarm rate. Also, DO can isolate multiple faults. DPCA required a minor training effort; however, it cannot identify two or more sequential faults.

M3 - Paper

SP - 265

EP - 270

ER -

Tudon Martinez JC, Morales-Menendez R, Garza Castañon LE. Fault detection and diagnosis in a heat exchanger. 2009. Papel presentado en ICINCO 2009 - 6th International Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics, Proceedings, .