TY - JOUR
T1 - A mathematical model approach quantifying patients' response to changes in mechanical ventilation: Evaluation in pressure support
AU - Larraza, S.
AU - Dey, N.
AU - Karbing, D.S.
AU - Jensen, J.B.
AU - Nygaard, M.
AU - Winding, R.
AU - Rees, S.E.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Elsevier Inc.
Copyright:
Copyright 2017 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2015/10/1
Y1 - 2015/10/1
N2 - Purpose: This article evaluates how mathematical models of gas exchange, blood acid-base status, chemical respiratory drive, and muscle function can describe the respiratory response of spontaneously breathing patients to different levels of pressure support. Methods: The models were evaluated with data from 12 patients ventilated in pressure support ventilation. Models were tuned with clinical data (arterial blood gas measurement, ventilation, and respiratory gas fractions of O
2 and CO
2) to describe each patient at the clinical level of pressure support. Patients were ventilated up to 5 different pressure support levels, for 15 minutes at each level to achieve steady-state conditions. Model-simulated values of respiratory frequency (fR), arterial pH (pHa), and end-tidal CO
2 (FeCO
2) were compared to measured values at each pressure support level. Results: Model simulations compared well to measured data with Bland-Altman bias and limits of agreement of fR of 0.7 ± 2.2 per minute, pHa of -0.0007 ± 0.019, and FeCO
2 of -0.001 ± 0.003. Conclusion: The models describe patients' fR, pHa, and FeCO
2 response to changes in pressure support with low bias and narrow limits of agreement.
AB - Purpose: This article evaluates how mathematical models of gas exchange, blood acid-base status, chemical respiratory drive, and muscle function can describe the respiratory response of spontaneously breathing patients to different levels of pressure support. Methods: The models were evaluated with data from 12 patients ventilated in pressure support ventilation. Models were tuned with clinical data (arterial blood gas measurement, ventilation, and respiratory gas fractions of O
2 and CO
2) to describe each patient at the clinical level of pressure support. Patients were ventilated up to 5 different pressure support levels, for 15 minutes at each level to achieve steady-state conditions. Model-simulated values of respiratory frequency (fR), arterial pH (pHa), and end-tidal CO
2 (FeCO
2) were compared to measured values at each pressure support level. Results: Model simulations compared well to measured data with Bland-Altman bias and limits of agreement of fR of 0.7 ± 2.2 per minute, pHa of -0.0007 ± 0.019, and FeCO
2 of -0.001 ± 0.003. Conclusion: The models describe patients' fR, pHa, and FeCO
2 response to changes in pressure support with low bias and narrow limits of agreement.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84941314928&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84941314928&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.05.010
DO - 10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.05.010
M3 - Article
SN - 0883-9441
VL - 30
SP - 1008
EP - 1015
JO - Journal of Critical Care
JF - Journal of Critical Care
IS - 5
ER -