States of emergency, courts, and global norms in Latin America

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Regimes of exception 1 are an old foe of human rights in Latin America. These constitutional clauses have become infamous for facilitating military intervention and restricting the enjoyment of civil and political rights in “emergency” situations to deal with social unrest, ever since the 19th century (Loveman, 1993). In fact, the “regime of exception” mechanism itself is an example of how the globalization of law has the potential to be a double-edged sword; the mechanism was imported from European constitutional models by Latin American legislators during the 19th century (Aguilar Rivera, 1996; FixZamudio, 2004). The specifi c question we pose in this chapter is: How have constitutional courts been able to protect human rights during regimes of exception in Bolivia, Ecuador, and Peru? And how have global treaty norms been used by national judiciaries to shift globalized repressive legal practices?
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Politics of the Globalization of Law: Getting from Rights to Justice
Chapter8
Pages8-16
Number of pages16
ISBN (Electronic)9780203066683
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

state of emergency
Latin America
regime
human rights
military intervention
legal usage
constitutional court
political right
Ecuador
Bolivia
civil rights
Peru
treaty
globalization
Law

Cite this

Wright, C. (2013). States of emergency, courts, and global norms in Latin America. In The Politics of the Globalization of Law: Getting from Rights to Justice (pp. 8-16) https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203066683
Wright, Claire. / States of emergency, courts, and global norms in Latin America. The Politics of the Globalization of Law: Getting from Rights to Justice. 2013. pp. 8-16
@inbook{ce6e9a5cb8354d548fa51d6adea4ee6f,
title = "States of emergency, courts, and global norms in Latin America",
abstract = "Regimes of exception 1 are an old foe of human rights in Latin America. These constitutional clauses have become infamous for facilitating military intervention and restricting the enjoyment of civil and political rights in “emergency” situations to deal with social unrest, ever since the 19th century (Loveman, 1993). In fact, the “regime of exception” mechanism itself is an example of how the globalization of law has the potential to be a double-edged sword; the mechanism was imported from European constitutional models by Latin American legislators during the 19th century (Aguilar Rivera, 1996; FixZamudio, 2004). The specifi c question we pose in this chapter is: How have constitutional courts been able to protect human rights during regimes of exception in Bolivia, Ecuador, and Peru? And how have global treaty norms been used by national judiciaries to shift globalized repressive legal practices?",
author = "Claire Wright",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4324/9780203066683",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780203066683",
pages = "8--16",
booktitle = "The Politics of the Globalization of Law: Getting from Rights to Justice",

}

Wright, C 2013, States of emergency, courts, and global norms in Latin America. in The Politics of the Globalization of Law: Getting from Rights to Justice. pp. 8-16. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203066683

States of emergency, courts, and global norms in Latin America. / Wright, Claire.

The Politics of the Globalization of Law: Getting from Rights to Justice. 2013. p. 8-16.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - States of emergency, courts, and global norms in Latin America

AU - Wright, Claire

PY - 2013/1/1

Y1 - 2013/1/1

N2 - Regimes of exception 1 are an old foe of human rights in Latin America. These constitutional clauses have become infamous for facilitating military intervention and restricting the enjoyment of civil and political rights in “emergency” situations to deal with social unrest, ever since the 19th century (Loveman, 1993). In fact, the “regime of exception” mechanism itself is an example of how the globalization of law has the potential to be a double-edged sword; the mechanism was imported from European constitutional models by Latin American legislators during the 19th century (Aguilar Rivera, 1996; FixZamudio, 2004). The specifi c question we pose in this chapter is: How have constitutional courts been able to protect human rights during regimes of exception in Bolivia, Ecuador, and Peru? And how have global treaty norms been used by national judiciaries to shift globalized repressive legal practices?

AB - Regimes of exception 1 are an old foe of human rights in Latin America. These constitutional clauses have become infamous for facilitating military intervention and restricting the enjoyment of civil and political rights in “emergency” situations to deal with social unrest, ever since the 19th century (Loveman, 1993). In fact, the “regime of exception” mechanism itself is an example of how the globalization of law has the potential to be a double-edged sword; the mechanism was imported from European constitutional models by Latin American legislators during the 19th century (Aguilar Rivera, 1996; FixZamudio, 2004). The specifi c question we pose in this chapter is: How have constitutional courts been able to protect human rights during regimes of exception in Bolivia, Ecuador, and Peru? And how have global treaty norms been used by national judiciaries to shift globalized repressive legal practices?

U2 - 10.4324/9780203066683

DO - 10.4324/9780203066683

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9780203066683

SP - 8

EP - 16

BT - The Politics of the Globalization of Law: Getting from Rights to Justice

ER -

Wright C. States of emergency, courts, and global norms in Latin America. In The Politics of the Globalization of Law: Getting from Rights to Justice. 2013. p. 8-16 https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203066683