TY - JOUR
T1 - Resúmenes clínicos problematizados para el aprendizaje de la clínica.
AU - Cobos-Aguilar, Héctor
AU - Pérez-Cortés, Patricia
AU - Benavides-Caballero, Teresa de Jesús
AU - Vázquez-Guerrero, Arturo
AU - Arteaga-Chávez, Brenda
AU - Cepeda-Corona, Ana
AU - Nájera-Rubio, Selene
AU - Rangel-Padilla, Andrea
AU - Peralta-Chávez, Diana
N1 - Copyright:
This record is sourced from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
PY - 2009/3/1
Y1 - 2009/3/1
N2 - OBJECTIVE: to evaluate clinical skills indicators (CSI) with summarized real clinical cases (SRCC) by two generations of pregraduates interns. METHODS: with a descriptive survey design 430 SRCC were elaborated according to the CSI: risk factors, clinical diagnosis, laboratory and x-ray diagnosis, commission and omission iatrogenesis procedures, therapeutics, nosology and peer critical medical actions. An evaluation scale for the clinical cases included: a relationship with the clinical experience, and the CSI selected. The final evaluation was considered as adequate or inadequate and was performed independently by three medical social service students. RESULTS: except for family medicine, the SRCC were related to the clinical experience of the students. A 62 % of the total was considered as adequate. The CSI assessed were related to risk factors (18 %), clinical diagnosis (32 %), omission and commission iatrogenesis (9 %), laboratory and x-ray diagnosis resources (16 %), therapeutics (17 %), nosology (9 %) and a critical to peer medical actions (3 %). CONCLUSIONS: the SRCC patients studied from different points of view by the interns included the CSI. Therefore, this action is advisable for the improvement of the patients' clinical approach.
AB - OBJECTIVE: to evaluate clinical skills indicators (CSI) with summarized real clinical cases (SRCC) by two generations of pregraduates interns. METHODS: with a descriptive survey design 430 SRCC were elaborated according to the CSI: risk factors, clinical diagnosis, laboratory and x-ray diagnosis, commission and omission iatrogenesis procedures, therapeutics, nosology and peer critical medical actions. An evaluation scale for the clinical cases included: a relationship with the clinical experience, and the CSI selected. The final evaluation was considered as adequate or inadequate and was performed independently by three medical social service students. RESULTS: except for family medicine, the SRCC were related to the clinical experience of the students. A 62 % of the total was considered as adequate. The CSI assessed were related to risk factors (18 %), clinical diagnosis (32 %), omission and commission iatrogenesis (9 %), laboratory and x-ray diagnosis resources (16 %), therapeutics (17 %), nosology (9 %) and a critical to peer medical actions (3 %). CONCLUSIONS: the SRCC patients studied from different points of view by the interns included the CSI. Therefore, this action is advisable for the improvement of the patients' clinical approach.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77957344334&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77957344334&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
SN - 0443-5117
VL - 47
SP - 157
EP - 164
JO - Revista médica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social
JF - Revista médica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social
IS - 2
ER -