Reproducibility of the measurement of central corneal thickness in healthy subjects obtained with the optical low coherence reflectometry pachymeter and comparison with the ultrasonic pachymetry

Manuel Garza-Leon, Eduardo Plancarte-Lozano, Agustín Del Valle-Penella, María De Lourdes Guzmán-Martínez, Andrés Villarreal-González

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Corneal pachymetry is widely used for refractive surgery and follow up in keratoconus, accurate measurement is essential for a safe surgery. Objective: To assess intraobserver reliability of central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements using optical low-coherence reflectometry (OLCR) technology and its agreement with ultrasonic pachymeter (US). Method: Randomized and prospective comparative evaluation of diagnostic technology. One randomly healthy eye of subjects was scanned three times with both devices. Intraobserver within-subject standard deviation (Sw), coefficient of variation (CVw) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were obtained for reliability analysis; for study agreement, data were analyzed using the paired-sample t test and the Bland-Altman LoA method. The mean of three scans of each equipment was used to assess the LoA. Results: The study enrolled 30 eyes of 30 subjects with average age of 28.70 ± 8.06 years. For repeatability, the Sw were 3.41 and 5.96 μ, the intraobserver CVw was 2 and 4% and ICC 0.991 and 0.988, for OLCR and US respectively. The mean CCT difference between OLCR and US was 8.90 ± 9.03 μ (95% confidence interval: 5.52-2.27 μ), and the LoA was 35.40 μ. Conclusions: OLCR technology provided reliable intraobserver CCT measurements. Both pachymetry measurements may be used interchangeably with minimum calibration adjustment.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)50-55
Number of pages6
JournalCirugia y Cirujanos (English Edition)
Volume86
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2018

Fingerprint

Corneal Pachymetry
Ultrasonics
Healthy Volunteers
Technology
Refractive Surgical Procedures
Keratoconus
Equipment and Supplies
Calibration
Confidence Intervals

Bibliographical note

Copyright: © 2018 Permanyer.

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Garza-Leon, Manuel ; Plancarte-Lozano, Eduardo ; Valle-Penella, Agustín Del ; De Lourdes Guzmán-Martínez, María ; Villarreal-González, Andrés. / Reproducibility of the measurement of central corneal thickness in healthy subjects obtained with the optical low coherence reflectometry pachymeter and comparison with the ultrasonic pachymetry. In: Cirugia y Cirujanos (English Edition). 2018 ; Vol. 86, No. 1. pp. 50-55.
@article{c2a0403093b64e0695eac37468cb89c9,
title = "Reproducibility of the measurement of central corneal thickness in healthy subjects obtained with the optical low coherence reflectometry pachymeter and comparison with the ultrasonic pachymetry",
abstract = "Background: Corneal pachymetry is widely used for refractive surgery and follow up in keratoconus, accurate measurement is essential for a safe surgery. Objective: To assess intraobserver reliability of central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements using optical low-coherence reflectometry (OLCR) technology and its agreement with ultrasonic pachymeter (US). Method: Randomized and prospective comparative evaluation of diagnostic technology. One randomly healthy eye of subjects was scanned three times with both devices. Intraobserver within-subject standard deviation (Sw), coefficient of variation (CVw) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were obtained for reliability analysis; for study agreement, data were analyzed using the paired-sample t test and the Bland-Altman LoA method. The mean of three scans of each equipment was used to assess the LoA. Results: The study enrolled 30 eyes of 30 subjects with average age of 28.70 ± 8.06 years. For repeatability, the Sw were 3.41 and 5.96 μ, the intraobserver CVw was 2 and 4{\%} and ICC 0.991 and 0.988, for OLCR and US respectively. The mean CCT difference between OLCR and US was 8.90 ± 9.03 μ (95{\%} confidence interval: 5.52-2.27 μ), and the LoA was 35.40 μ. Conclusions: OLCR technology provided reliable intraobserver CCT measurements. Both pachymetry measurements may be used interchangeably with minimum calibration adjustment.",
author = "Manuel Garza-Leon and Eduardo Plancarte-Lozano and Valle-Penella, {Agust{\'i}n Del} and {De Lourdes Guzm{\'a}n-Mart{\'i}nez}, Mar{\'i}a and Andr{\'e}s Villarreal-Gonz{\'a}lez",
note = "Copyright: {\circledC} 2018 Permanyer.",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.24875/CIRU.M18000002",
language = "English",
volume = "86",
pages = "50--55",
journal = "Cirugia y Cirujanos",
issn = "0009-7411",
publisher = "Mexican Academy of Surgery",
number = "1",

}

Reproducibility of the measurement of central corneal thickness in healthy subjects obtained with the optical low coherence reflectometry pachymeter and comparison with the ultrasonic pachymetry. / Garza-Leon, Manuel; Plancarte-Lozano, Eduardo; Valle-Penella, Agustín Del; De Lourdes Guzmán-Martínez, María; Villarreal-González, Andrés.

In: Cirugia y Cirujanos (English Edition), Vol. 86, No. 1, 01.01.2018, p. 50-55.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reproducibility of the measurement of central corneal thickness in healthy subjects obtained with the optical low coherence reflectometry pachymeter and comparison with the ultrasonic pachymetry

AU - Garza-Leon, Manuel

AU - Plancarte-Lozano, Eduardo

AU - Valle-Penella, Agustín Del

AU - De Lourdes Guzmán-Martínez, María

AU - Villarreal-González, Andrés

N1 - Copyright: © 2018 Permanyer.

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Background: Corneal pachymetry is widely used for refractive surgery and follow up in keratoconus, accurate measurement is essential for a safe surgery. Objective: To assess intraobserver reliability of central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements using optical low-coherence reflectometry (OLCR) technology and its agreement with ultrasonic pachymeter (US). Method: Randomized and prospective comparative evaluation of diagnostic technology. One randomly healthy eye of subjects was scanned three times with both devices. Intraobserver within-subject standard deviation (Sw), coefficient of variation (CVw) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were obtained for reliability analysis; for study agreement, data were analyzed using the paired-sample t test and the Bland-Altman LoA method. The mean of three scans of each equipment was used to assess the LoA. Results: The study enrolled 30 eyes of 30 subjects with average age of 28.70 ± 8.06 years. For repeatability, the Sw were 3.41 and 5.96 μ, the intraobserver CVw was 2 and 4% and ICC 0.991 and 0.988, for OLCR and US respectively. The mean CCT difference between OLCR and US was 8.90 ± 9.03 μ (95% confidence interval: 5.52-2.27 μ), and the LoA was 35.40 μ. Conclusions: OLCR technology provided reliable intraobserver CCT measurements. Both pachymetry measurements may be used interchangeably with minimum calibration adjustment.

AB - Background: Corneal pachymetry is widely used for refractive surgery and follow up in keratoconus, accurate measurement is essential for a safe surgery. Objective: To assess intraobserver reliability of central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements using optical low-coherence reflectometry (OLCR) technology and its agreement with ultrasonic pachymeter (US). Method: Randomized and prospective comparative evaluation of diagnostic technology. One randomly healthy eye of subjects was scanned three times with both devices. Intraobserver within-subject standard deviation (Sw), coefficient of variation (CVw) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were obtained for reliability analysis; for study agreement, data were analyzed using the paired-sample t test and the Bland-Altman LoA method. The mean of three scans of each equipment was used to assess the LoA. Results: The study enrolled 30 eyes of 30 subjects with average age of 28.70 ± 8.06 years. For repeatability, the Sw were 3.41 and 5.96 μ, the intraobserver CVw was 2 and 4% and ICC 0.991 and 0.988, for OLCR and US respectively. The mean CCT difference between OLCR and US was 8.90 ± 9.03 μ (95% confidence interval: 5.52-2.27 μ), and the LoA was 35.40 μ. Conclusions: OLCR technology provided reliable intraobserver CCT measurements. Both pachymetry measurements may be used interchangeably with minimum calibration adjustment.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054137421&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85054137421&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.24875/CIRU.M18000002

DO - 10.24875/CIRU.M18000002

M3 - Article

C2 - 29681640

AN - SCOPUS:85054137421

VL - 86

SP - 50

EP - 55

JO - Cirugia y Cirujanos

JF - Cirugia y Cirujanos

SN - 0009-7411

IS - 1

ER -