Interpretation: New focus within literary research

Julieta Leo

doi:10.21659/rupkatha.v9n3.05

Interpretation: New focus within literary research

Julieta Leo

Departamento de Humanidades, Educación y Psicopedagogía

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

The differences and difficulties found upon doing literary research are analyzed. The fact that researchers also interpret is highlighted as well as the need for sufficient time and freedom to do their research. The use of adequate selection criteria, the subjectivity and intuition of the exegete, as well as the use of concepts such as respect for the literal meaning (Umberto Eco) and the analogy of proportion (Inger Enkvist) are proposed as appropriate guidelines for establishing renovated, but systematic reading of texts.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	27-35
Number of pages	9
Journal	Rupkatha Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities
Volume	9
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.21659/rupkatha.v9n3.05
Publication status	Published - 20 Sept 2017

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

General Arts and Humanities

Access to Document

10.21659/rupkatha.v9n3.05

https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85031810527&origin=inward

Cite this

@article{e95aabfcf8254b94a155d51a66681184,

title = "Interpretation: New focus within literary research",

abstract = "The differences and difficulties found upon doing literary research are analyzed. The fact that researchers also interpret is highlighted as well as the need for sufficient time and freedom to do their research. The use of adequate selection criteria, the subjectivity and intuition of the exegete, as well as the use of concepts such as respect for the literal meaning (Umberto Eco) and the analogy of proportion (Inger Enkvist) are proposed as appropriate guidelines for establishing renovated, but systematic reading of texts.",

author = "Julieta Leo",

year = "2017",

month = sep,

day = "20",

doi = "10.21659/rupkatha.v9n3.05",

language = "English",

volume = "9",

pages = "27--35",

journal = "Rupkatha Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities",

issn = "0975-2935",

publisher = "Sreecheta Mukherjee",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interpretation: New focus within literary research

AU - Leo, Julieta

PY - 2017/9/20

Y1 - 2017/9/20

N2 - The differences and difficulties found upon doing literary research are analyzed. The fact that researchers also interpret is highlighted as well as the need for sufficient time and freedom to do their research. The use of adequate selection criteria, the subjectivity and intuition of the exegete, as well as the use of concepts such as respect for the literal meaning (Umberto Eco) and the analogy of proportion (Inger Enkvist) are proposed as appropriate guidelines for establishing renovated, but systematic reading of texts.

AB - The differences and difficulties found upon doing literary research are analyzed. The fact that researchers also interpret is highlighted as well as the need for sufficient time and freedom to do their research. The use of adequate selection criteria, the subjectivity and intuition of the exegete, as well as the use of concepts such as respect for the literal meaning (Umberto Eco) and the analogy of proportion (Inger Enkvist) are proposed as appropriate guidelines for establishing renovated, but systematic reading of texts.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85031810527&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85031810527&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.21659/rupkatha.v9n3.05

DO - 10.21659/rupkatha.v9n3.05

M3 - Article

SN - 0975-2935

VL - 9

SP - 27

EP - 35

JO - Rupkatha Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities

JF - Rupkatha Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities

IS - 3

ER -

Interpretation: New focus within literary research

Abstract

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this