Interpretation: New focus within literary research

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

© AesthetixMS 2016. The differences and difficulties found upon doing literary research are analyzed. The fact that researchers also interpret is highlighted as well as the need for sufficient time and freedom to do their research. The use of adequate selection criteria, the subjectivity and intuition of the exegete, as well as the use of concepts such as respect for the literal meaning (Umberto Eco) and the analogy of proportion (Inger Enkvist) are proposed as appropriate guidelines for establishing renovated, but systematic reading of texts.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)27-35
Number of pages9
JournalRupkatha Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 20 Sep 2017

Fingerprint

Literal Meaning
Umberto Eco
Intuition
Proportion
Exegete
Subjectivity

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Arts and Humanities(all)

Cite this

@article{e95aabfcf8254b94a155d51a66681184,
title = "Interpretation: New focus within literary research",
abstract = "{\circledC} AesthetixMS 2016. The differences and difficulties found upon doing literary research are analyzed. The fact that researchers also interpret is highlighted as well as the need for sufficient time and freedom to do their research. The use of adequate selection criteria, the subjectivity and intuition of the exegete, as well as the use of concepts such as respect for the literal meaning (Umberto Eco) and the analogy of proportion (Inger Enkvist) are proposed as appropriate guidelines for establishing renovated, but systematic reading of texts.",
author = "Julieta Leo",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
day = "20",
doi = "10.21659/rupkatha.v9n3.05",
language = "English",
pages = "27--35",
journal = "Rupkatha Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities",
issn = "0975-2935",
publisher = "Sreecheta Mukherjee",

}

Interpretation: New focus within literary research. / Leo, Julieta.

In: Rupkatha Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 20.09.2017, p. 27-35.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interpretation: New focus within literary research

AU - Leo, Julieta

PY - 2017/9/20

Y1 - 2017/9/20

N2 - © AesthetixMS 2016. The differences and difficulties found upon doing literary research are analyzed. The fact that researchers also interpret is highlighted as well as the need for sufficient time and freedom to do their research. The use of adequate selection criteria, the subjectivity and intuition of the exegete, as well as the use of concepts such as respect for the literal meaning (Umberto Eco) and the analogy of proportion (Inger Enkvist) are proposed as appropriate guidelines for establishing renovated, but systematic reading of texts.

AB - © AesthetixMS 2016. The differences and difficulties found upon doing literary research are analyzed. The fact that researchers also interpret is highlighted as well as the need for sufficient time and freedom to do their research. The use of adequate selection criteria, the subjectivity and intuition of the exegete, as well as the use of concepts such as respect for the literal meaning (Umberto Eco) and the analogy of proportion (Inger Enkvist) are proposed as appropriate guidelines for establishing renovated, but systematic reading of texts.

U2 - 10.21659/rupkatha.v9n3.05

DO - 10.21659/rupkatha.v9n3.05

M3 - Article

SP - 27

EP - 35

JO - Rupkatha Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities

JF - Rupkatha Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities

SN - 0975-2935

ER -