The differences and difficulties found upon doing literary research are analyzed. The fact that researchers also interpret is highlighted as well as the need for sufficient time and freedom to do their research. The use of adequate selection criteria, the subjectivity and intuition of the exegete, as well as the use of concepts such as respect for the literal meaning (Umberto Eco) and the analogy of proportion (Inger Enkvist) are proposed as appropriate guidelines for establishing renovated, but systematic reading of texts.
|Number of pages||9|
|Journal||Rupkatha Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities|
|Publication status||Published - 20 Sep 2017|
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Arts and Humanities(all)