Gender, argumentation and inference in Mexican political and media discourse

Olga Nelly Estrada, Griselda Zárate

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (peer-reviewed)

Abstract

This paper aims to identify the inferential processes in argument production in Mexican media and political discourse from a theoretical interdisciplinary perspective including gender studies, argumentation theory. According to gender studies theorist, Gayle Rubin (1986) the concept of being a woman and to act in political scenarios is more criticized in a sex-gender culture. The study also incorporates an integrated operative model of argumentation (Zárate 2012, 2015), which contains logical, emotional, visceral and kisceral modes, drawing from Toulmin, Rieke and Janik (1979) and Gilbert (1997).
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationArgumentation and Inference: Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Argumentation, Fribourg 2017
EditorsSteve Oswald, Didier Maillat
PublisherCollege Publications
Pages287
Number of pages296
Volume2
ISBN (Print)978-1-84890-284-8
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Publication series

NameStudies in Logic and Argumentation

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Gender, argumentation and inference in Mexican political and media discourse'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Estrada, O. N., & Zárate, G. (2018). Gender, argumentation and inference in Mexican political and media discourse. In S. Oswald, & D. Maillat (Eds.), Argumentation and Inference: Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Argumentation, Fribourg 2017 (Vol. 2, pp. 287). (Studies in Logic and Argumentation). College Publications.