TY - JOUR
T1 - Characterizing Extrasolar Planets from Transit Light Curves obtained at the Universidad de Monterrey Observatory – Part 3
AU - Sada, Pedro V.
PY - 2018/10/1
Y1 - 2018/10/1
N2 - At the Universidad de Monterrey Observatory (MPC 720) we carried out a
program for observing exoplanet transits and registering their light
curves using telescopes of modest aperture and standard photometric
filters between 2005 and 2016. In our archives we have over 340 transits
of over 75 known systems. Our goal is to combine individual transit
light curves of the same system taken at different times but with the
same equipment. We then analyze the combined light curves in conjunction
with the radial velocity information available from the literature in
order to confirm, improve or revise the main parameters that
characterize the transiting system. It is important to systematically
continue observing these systems not only to improve and refine our
understanding of them, but also to record any possible transient
phenomenon and monitor for possible period changes, as reflected in the
mid-transit times. We report our observations of 48 individual exoplanet
transit light curves and the results from successfully combining 7 light
curves for GJ 436 (Ic), 7 for HAT-P-20 (Ic), 5 for WASP-14 (Rc), 4 for
WASP-26 (Ic), 5 for WASP-43 (Ic), 6 for WASP-50 (Ic), 6 for XO-2 (Ic), 4
for XO-3 (Ic), and 4 for XO-4 (Ic). From these we then derive planet
sizes (Rp/R*), orbital distances (a/R*)
and orbital inclinations (i) for these systems using standard modeling
software such as EXOFAST and TAP. In most cases we confirm the
parameters reported in the literature. For the GJ 436, WASP-50 and XO-2
systems we derive planet sizes which are marginally larger than
literature values. For the WASP-43 and GJ 436 systems we derive slightly
higher inclinations accompanied by slight increases in orbital distance
compared with HST results. Our WASP-26 results show an anomalous 20%
larger planet size, but we suspect that to be an artifact of light
contamination in the light curve due to a nearby star. From our
mid-transit times and those of the literature we do not find any
statistically significant deviations from a fixed orbital period for
these systems. Our results validate the presented methodology and show
that college observatories with small telescopes are able to adopt
usefull extrasolar planet transit follow-up observing programs.
AB - At the Universidad de Monterrey Observatory (MPC 720) we carried out a
program for observing exoplanet transits and registering their light
curves using telescopes of modest aperture and standard photometric
filters between 2005 and 2016. In our archives we have over 340 transits
of over 75 known systems. Our goal is to combine individual transit
light curves of the same system taken at different times but with the
same equipment. We then analyze the combined light curves in conjunction
with the radial velocity information available from the literature in
order to confirm, improve or revise the main parameters that
characterize the transiting system. It is important to systematically
continue observing these systems not only to improve and refine our
understanding of them, but also to record any possible transient
phenomenon and monitor for possible period changes, as reflected in the
mid-transit times. We report our observations of 48 individual exoplanet
transit light curves and the results from successfully combining 7 light
curves for GJ 436 (Ic), 7 for HAT-P-20 (Ic), 5 for WASP-14 (Rc), 4 for
WASP-26 (Ic), 5 for WASP-43 (Ic), 6 for WASP-50 (Ic), 6 for XO-2 (Ic), 4
for XO-3 (Ic), and 4 for XO-4 (Ic). From these we then derive planet
sizes (Rp/R*), orbital distances (a/R*)
and orbital inclinations (i) for these systems using standard modeling
software such as EXOFAST and TAP. In most cases we confirm the
parameters reported in the literature. For the GJ 436, WASP-50 and XO-2
systems we derive planet sizes which are marginally larger than
literature values. For the WASP-43 and GJ 436 systems we derive slightly
higher inclinations accompanied by slight increases in orbital distance
compared with HST results. Our WASP-26 results show an anomalous 20%
larger planet size, but we suspect that to be an artifact of light
contamination in the light curve due to a nearby star. From our
mid-transit times and those of the literature we do not find any
statistically significant deviations from a fixed orbital period for
these systems. Our results validate the presented methodology and show
that college observatories with small telescopes are able to adopt
usefull extrasolar planet transit follow-up observing programs.
M3 - Article
VL - 50
JO - American Astronomical Society, DPS meeting #50
JF - American Astronomical Society, DPS meeting #50
ER -