Bibliometric analysis of author collaboration in engineering management research

Heather Keathley, Andrew Bean, Tianxiang Chen, Kyra Vila, Kai Ye, Fernando Gonzalez-Aleu

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

While many researchers would agree that the engineering management research field has been increasing in maturity since its inception due to the significant body of work published on various aspects of engineering management, this evolution has not been empirically established. The purpose of this preliminary work is to assess the development of this field by evaluating the anatomy of authorship in the field. It has been argued that examining papers published within an academic journal can provide useful information about the evolution of the underlying field. Thus, using the Engineering Management Journal (EMJ) to represent the engineering management field, bibliometric analyses are applied to the 227 papers published in the most recent ten years in the journal. Questions addressed about the field include: Who is studying these topics? To what extent are there communities of authors collaborating in research groups? How internationalized has engineering management become with respect to author location? How multi-disciplinary has the field become? These analyses will provide insight into how the field is evolving and possible future directions. This work represents the first phase of this research and the evaluation of EMJ will be extended in future work to include evaluation of other questions related to the content and research methodologies employed by papers published in EMJ.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationInternational Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Management 2015
PublisherAmerican Society for Engineering Management
Pages679-689
Number of pages11
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2015
EventInternational Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Management 2015, ASEM 2015 -
Duration: 1 Jan 2015 → …

Conference

ConferenceInternational Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Management 2015, ASEM 2015
Period1/1/15 → …

Fingerprint

Engineering management
Bibliometric analysis
Management research
Evaluation
Maturity
Authorship
Academic journals
Future directions
Bibliometrics

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Management of Technology and Innovation
  • Strategy and Management
  • Information Systems and Management

Cite this

Keathley, H., Bean, A., Chen, T., Vila, K., Ye, K., & Gonzalez-Aleu, F. (2015). Bibliometric analysis of author collaboration in engineering management research. In International Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Management 2015 (pp. 679-689). American Society for Engineering Management.
Keathley, Heather ; Bean, Andrew ; Chen, Tianxiang ; Vila, Kyra ; Ye, Kai ; Gonzalez-Aleu, Fernando. / Bibliometric analysis of author collaboration in engineering management research. International Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Management 2015. American Society for Engineering Management, 2015. pp. 679-689
@inproceedings{52e3fb4122544c7c97b288deaec321c8,
title = "Bibliometric analysis of author collaboration in engineering management research",
abstract = "While many researchers would agree that the engineering management research field has been increasing in maturity since its inception due to the significant body of work published on various aspects of engineering management, this evolution has not been empirically established. The purpose of this preliminary work is to assess the development of this field by evaluating the anatomy of authorship in the field. It has been argued that examining papers published within an academic journal can provide useful information about the evolution of the underlying field. Thus, using the Engineering Management Journal (EMJ) to represent the engineering management field, bibliometric analyses are applied to the 227 papers published in the most recent ten years in the journal. Questions addressed about the field include: Who is studying these topics? To what extent are there communities of authors collaborating in research groups? How internationalized has engineering management become with respect to author location? How multi-disciplinary has the field become? These analyses will provide insight into how the field is evolving and possible future directions. This work represents the first phase of this research and the evaluation of EMJ will be extended in future work to include evaluation of other questions related to the content and research methodologies employed by papers published in EMJ.",
author = "Heather Keathley and Andrew Bean and Tianxiang Chen and Kyra Vila and Kai Ye and Fernando Gonzalez-Aleu",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English",
pages = "679--689",
booktitle = "International Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Management 2015",
publisher = "American Society for Engineering Management",
address = "United States",

}

Keathley, H, Bean, A, Chen, T, Vila, K, Ye, K & Gonzalez-Aleu, F 2015, Bibliometric analysis of author collaboration in engineering management research. in International Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Management 2015. American Society for Engineering Management, pp. 679-689, International Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Management 2015, ASEM 2015, 1/1/15.

Bibliometric analysis of author collaboration in engineering management research. / Keathley, Heather; Bean, Andrew; Chen, Tianxiang; Vila, Kyra; Ye, Kai; Gonzalez-Aleu, Fernando.

International Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Management 2015. American Society for Engineering Management, 2015. p. 679-689.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

TY - GEN

T1 - Bibliometric analysis of author collaboration in engineering management research

AU - Keathley, Heather

AU - Bean, Andrew

AU - Chen, Tianxiang

AU - Vila, Kyra

AU - Ye, Kai

AU - Gonzalez-Aleu, Fernando

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - While many researchers would agree that the engineering management research field has been increasing in maturity since its inception due to the significant body of work published on various aspects of engineering management, this evolution has not been empirically established. The purpose of this preliminary work is to assess the development of this field by evaluating the anatomy of authorship in the field. It has been argued that examining papers published within an academic journal can provide useful information about the evolution of the underlying field. Thus, using the Engineering Management Journal (EMJ) to represent the engineering management field, bibliometric analyses are applied to the 227 papers published in the most recent ten years in the journal. Questions addressed about the field include: Who is studying these topics? To what extent are there communities of authors collaborating in research groups? How internationalized has engineering management become with respect to author location? How multi-disciplinary has the field become? These analyses will provide insight into how the field is evolving and possible future directions. This work represents the first phase of this research and the evaluation of EMJ will be extended in future work to include evaluation of other questions related to the content and research methodologies employed by papers published in EMJ.

AB - While many researchers would agree that the engineering management research field has been increasing in maturity since its inception due to the significant body of work published on various aspects of engineering management, this evolution has not been empirically established. The purpose of this preliminary work is to assess the development of this field by evaluating the anatomy of authorship in the field. It has been argued that examining papers published within an academic journal can provide useful information about the evolution of the underlying field. Thus, using the Engineering Management Journal (EMJ) to represent the engineering management field, bibliometric analyses are applied to the 227 papers published in the most recent ten years in the journal. Questions addressed about the field include: Who is studying these topics? To what extent are there communities of authors collaborating in research groups? How internationalized has engineering management become with respect to author location? How multi-disciplinary has the field become? These analyses will provide insight into how the field is evolving and possible future directions. This work represents the first phase of this research and the evaluation of EMJ will be extended in future work to include evaluation of other questions related to the content and research methodologies employed by papers published in EMJ.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84963720000&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84963720000&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

SP - 679

EP - 689

BT - International Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Management 2015

PB - American Society for Engineering Management

ER -

Keathley H, Bean A, Chen T, Vila K, Ye K, Gonzalez-Aleu F. Bibliometric analysis of author collaboration in engineering management research. In International Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Management 2015. American Society for Engineering Management. 2015. p. 679-689