Assessing the maturity of a research area: bibliometric review and proposed framework

Heather Keathley-Herring, Eileen Van Aken, Fernando Gonzalez-Aleu, Fernando Deschamps, Geert Letens, Pablo Cardenas Orlandini

Research output: Contribution to journalLiterature review

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

© 2016, Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary. In recent years, many disciplines have begun to adopt more systematic and standardized approaches to evaluate the impact and development of a research area with a stronger emphasis on quantitative techniques. In particular, identifying and analyzing the published literature have become important exercises for many disciplines and methods such as systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis have become more regularly used to obtain a deeper understanding of a research area. One concept that is of particular interest is the maturity, or level of development, of a research area. While this concept has been mentioned in many works, it has not yet been formalized, resulting in a lack of consensus concerning the definition of research area maturity and analysis techniques to assess maturity. Therefore, most assessments of research area maturity consider only a subset of the possible criteria with significant differences in the metrics and analyses used among different disciplines. Due to the inconsistencies in the definition and assessment of this concept, a comprehensive synthesis of this literature area is needed. This paper presents the results of a study to identify and analyze the literature, define the maturity of a research area, and synthesize the criteria for assessing maturity. The results are used to develop a generalized maturity assessment framework that establishes a comprehensive set of criteria, which can be adapted for use across a variety of research areas.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)927-951
Number of pages25
JournalScientometrics
Volume109
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2016

Fingerprint

maturity
Hungary
literature
lack

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Sciences(all)
  • Computer Science Applications
  • Library and Information Sciences

Cite this

Keathley-Herring, H., Van Aken, E., Gonzalez-Aleu, F., Deschamps, F., Letens, G., & Orlandini, P. C. (2016). Assessing the maturity of a research area: bibliometric review and proposed framework. Scientometrics, 109(2), 927-951. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2096-x
Keathley-Herring, Heather ; Van Aken, Eileen ; Gonzalez-Aleu, Fernando ; Deschamps, Fernando ; Letens, Geert ; Orlandini, Pablo Cardenas. / Assessing the maturity of a research area: bibliometric review and proposed framework. In: Scientometrics. 2016 ; Vol. 109, No. 2. pp. 927-951.
@article{3ada2a4ed96c4a18870c3237c565d659,
title = "Assessing the maturity of a research area: bibliometric review and proposed framework",
abstract = "{\circledC} 2016, Akad{\'e}miai Kiad{\'o}, Budapest, Hungary. In recent years, many disciplines have begun to adopt more systematic and standardized approaches to evaluate the impact and development of a research area with a stronger emphasis on quantitative techniques. In particular, identifying and analyzing the published literature have become important exercises for many disciplines and methods such as systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis have become more regularly used to obtain a deeper understanding of a research area. One concept that is of particular interest is the maturity, or level of development, of a research area. While this concept has been mentioned in many works, it has not yet been formalized, resulting in a lack of consensus concerning the definition of research area maturity and analysis techniques to assess maturity. Therefore, most assessments of research area maturity consider only a subset of the possible criteria with significant differences in the metrics and analyses used among different disciplines. Due to the inconsistencies in the definition and assessment of this concept, a comprehensive synthesis of this literature area is needed. This paper presents the results of a study to identify and analyze the literature, define the maturity of a research area, and synthesize the criteria for assessing maturity. The results are used to develop a generalized maturity assessment framework that establishes a comprehensive set of criteria, which can be adapted for use across a variety of research areas.",
author = "Heather Keathley-Herring and {Van Aken}, Eileen and Fernando Gonzalez-Aleu and Fernando Deschamps and Geert Letens and Orlandini, {Pablo Cardenas}",
year = "2016",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11192-016-2096-x",
language = "English",
volume = "109",
pages = "927--951",
journal = "Scientometrics",
issn = "0138-9130",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "2",

}

Keathley-Herring, H, Van Aken, E, Gonzalez-Aleu, F, Deschamps, F, Letens, G & Orlandini, PC 2016, 'Assessing the maturity of a research area: bibliometric review and proposed framework', Scientometrics, vol. 109, no. 2, pp. 927-951. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2096-x

Assessing the maturity of a research area: bibliometric review and proposed framework. / Keathley-Herring, Heather; Van Aken, Eileen; Gonzalez-Aleu, Fernando; Deschamps, Fernando; Letens, Geert; Orlandini, Pablo Cardenas.

In: Scientometrics, Vol. 109, No. 2, 01.11.2016, p. 927-951.

Research output: Contribution to journalLiterature review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing the maturity of a research area: bibliometric review and proposed framework

AU - Keathley-Herring, Heather

AU - Van Aken, Eileen

AU - Gonzalez-Aleu, Fernando

AU - Deschamps, Fernando

AU - Letens, Geert

AU - Orlandini, Pablo Cardenas

PY - 2016/11/1

Y1 - 2016/11/1

N2 - © 2016, Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary. In recent years, many disciplines have begun to adopt more systematic and standardized approaches to evaluate the impact and development of a research area with a stronger emphasis on quantitative techniques. In particular, identifying and analyzing the published literature have become important exercises for many disciplines and methods such as systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis have become more regularly used to obtain a deeper understanding of a research area. One concept that is of particular interest is the maturity, or level of development, of a research area. While this concept has been mentioned in many works, it has not yet been formalized, resulting in a lack of consensus concerning the definition of research area maturity and analysis techniques to assess maturity. Therefore, most assessments of research area maturity consider only a subset of the possible criteria with significant differences in the metrics and analyses used among different disciplines. Due to the inconsistencies in the definition and assessment of this concept, a comprehensive synthesis of this literature area is needed. This paper presents the results of a study to identify and analyze the literature, define the maturity of a research area, and synthesize the criteria for assessing maturity. The results are used to develop a generalized maturity assessment framework that establishes a comprehensive set of criteria, which can be adapted for use across a variety of research areas.

AB - © 2016, Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary. In recent years, many disciplines have begun to adopt more systematic and standardized approaches to evaluate the impact and development of a research area with a stronger emphasis on quantitative techniques. In particular, identifying and analyzing the published literature have become important exercises for many disciplines and methods such as systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis have become more regularly used to obtain a deeper understanding of a research area. One concept that is of particular interest is the maturity, or level of development, of a research area. While this concept has been mentioned in many works, it has not yet been formalized, resulting in a lack of consensus concerning the definition of research area maturity and analysis techniques to assess maturity. Therefore, most assessments of research area maturity consider only a subset of the possible criteria with significant differences in the metrics and analyses used among different disciplines. Due to the inconsistencies in the definition and assessment of this concept, a comprehensive synthesis of this literature area is needed. This paper presents the results of a study to identify and analyze the literature, define the maturity of a research area, and synthesize the criteria for assessing maturity. The results are used to develop a generalized maturity assessment framework that establishes a comprehensive set of criteria, which can be adapted for use across a variety of research areas.

U2 - 10.1007/s11192-016-2096-x

DO - 10.1007/s11192-016-2096-x

M3 - Literature review

VL - 109

SP - 927

EP - 951

JO - Scientometrics

JF - Scientometrics

SN - 0138-9130

IS - 2

ER -