Argumentación en los textos de Andrea Villarreal, (1907-1910)

Translated title of the contribution: Argumentation in Andrea Villarreal's texts, (1907-1910)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This paper analyzes anarchist discourse in “Defend your honor, oh Anahuac!”, published in El Progreso, March 16, 1907, and “Senor Ines Ruiz” from Mujer Moderna, March 1910, from Mexican writer and activist Andrea Villarreal. Both texts were produced during the writer’s exile years (1904-1911). The theoretical framework is based on an operative model of argumentation (Zárate 2012; Toulmin, Rieke and Janik 1979; Gilbert 1997), which allows the identification of discursive markers that intensify or attenuate anarchist discourse. In this sense, this type of discourse may be defined as that which shows an ideology of resistance, or utopia (Ricoeur, 1989), uses different argumentative strategies to invert power (Foucault, 2008), expresses a pessimistic stance of the present, opposed to the future (Hinkelammert, 2002), and also includes emotional terms, which in some cases integrates religious words.
Original languageSpanish
Pages (from-to)173-184
JournalLenguas en Contexto
Issue number12
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Discourse
Argumentation
Writer
Anarchist
Stance
Religion
Discursive
Mujer
Discourse Types
Ideology
Activists
Emotion
Theoretical Framework
Utopia
Exile
Sense Type

Cite this

@article{312c957240544039bf6079f16cef649e,
title = "Argumentaci{\'o}n en los textos de Andrea Villarreal, (1907-1910)",
abstract = "This paper analyzes anarchist discourse in “Defend your honor, oh Anahuac!”, published in El Progreso, March 16, 1907, and “Senor Ines Ruiz” from Mujer Moderna, March 1910, from Mexican writer and activist Andrea Villarreal. Both texts were produced during the writer’s exile years (1904-1911). The theoretical framework is based on an operative model of argumentation (Z{\'a}rate 2012; Toulmin, Rieke and Janik 1979; Gilbert 1997), which allows the identification of discursive markers that intensify or attenuate anarchist discourse. In this sense, this type of discourse may be defined as that which shows an ideology of resistance, or utopia (Ricoeur, 1989), uses different argumentative strategies to invert power (Foucault, 2008), expresses a pessimistic stance of the present, opposed to the future (Hinkelammert, 2002), and also includes emotional terms, which in some cases integrates religious words.",
author = "Griselda Z{\'a}rate",
year = "2015",
language = "Spanish",
pages = "173--184",
journal = "Lenguas en Contexto",
issn = "2007-3038",
number = "12",

}

Argumentación en los textos de Andrea Villarreal, (1907-1910). / Zárate, Griselda.

In: Lenguas en Contexto, No. 12, 2015, p. 173-184.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Argumentación en los textos de Andrea Villarreal, (1907-1910)

AU - Zárate, Griselda

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - This paper analyzes anarchist discourse in “Defend your honor, oh Anahuac!”, published in El Progreso, March 16, 1907, and “Senor Ines Ruiz” from Mujer Moderna, March 1910, from Mexican writer and activist Andrea Villarreal. Both texts were produced during the writer’s exile years (1904-1911). The theoretical framework is based on an operative model of argumentation (Zárate 2012; Toulmin, Rieke and Janik 1979; Gilbert 1997), which allows the identification of discursive markers that intensify or attenuate anarchist discourse. In this sense, this type of discourse may be defined as that which shows an ideology of resistance, or utopia (Ricoeur, 1989), uses different argumentative strategies to invert power (Foucault, 2008), expresses a pessimistic stance of the present, opposed to the future (Hinkelammert, 2002), and also includes emotional terms, which in some cases integrates religious words.

AB - This paper analyzes anarchist discourse in “Defend your honor, oh Anahuac!”, published in El Progreso, March 16, 1907, and “Senor Ines Ruiz” from Mujer Moderna, March 1910, from Mexican writer and activist Andrea Villarreal. Both texts were produced during the writer’s exile years (1904-1911). The theoretical framework is based on an operative model of argumentation (Zárate 2012; Toulmin, Rieke and Janik 1979; Gilbert 1997), which allows the identification of discursive markers that intensify or attenuate anarchist discourse. In this sense, this type of discourse may be defined as that which shows an ideology of resistance, or utopia (Ricoeur, 1989), uses different argumentative strategies to invert power (Foucault, 2008), expresses a pessimistic stance of the present, opposed to the future (Hinkelammert, 2002), and also includes emotional terms, which in some cases integrates religious words.

M3 - Article

SP - 173

EP - 184

JO - Lenguas en Contexto

JF - Lenguas en Contexto

SN - 2007-3038

IS - 12

ER -