Animalizing the disadvantaged, mechanizing the wealthy: The convergence of socio-economic status and attribution of humanity

Mario Sainz, Rocío Martínez, Miguel Moya, Rosa Rodríguez-Bailón

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Differences between groups in socio-economic status (SES) are becoming more salient nowadays. In this context, we examined the animalistic and mechanistic dehumanization that both low and high-SES groups may experience respectively by conducting three studies. In study 1, we manipulated the SES of two fictitious groups (low vs. high-SES) and measured the humanity ascribed to them. Results showed that the low-SES group was animalized in comparison with the high-SES group, which was mechanized. In study 2, we manipulated the humanity of two fictitious groups by describing them as animals or machines and measured the perceived SES of the groups. Participants tended to attribute lower SES to the group described as animals and higher SES to the group described as machines. Finally, in study 3, we used an Implicit Association Test to replicate the results of studies 1 and 2. Taken together, these studies show that low-SES groups are considered as animal-like whereas high-SES groups are seen as robot-like. We discuss the implications of these findings in relation to the justification of income inequality within our society.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)423-430
Number of pages8
JournalInternational Journal of Psychology
Volume54
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2019
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Vulnerable Populations
Economics
Dehumanization
Socioeconomic Status
Attribution

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

@article{3ac4647908b0406b9ff34f517267d66f,
title = "Animalizing the disadvantaged, mechanizing the wealthy: The convergence of socio-economic status and attribution of humanity",
abstract = "Differences between groups in socio-economic status (SES) are becoming more salient nowadays. In this context, we examined the animalistic and mechanistic dehumanization that both low and high-SES groups may experience respectively by conducting three studies. In study 1, we manipulated the SES of two fictitious groups (low vs. high-SES) and measured the humanity ascribed to them. Results showed that the low-SES group was animalized in comparison with the high-SES group, which was mechanized. In study 2, we manipulated the humanity of two fictitious groups by describing them as animals or machines and measured the perceived SES of the groups. Participants tended to attribute lower SES to the group described as animals and higher SES to the group described as machines. Finally, in study 3, we used an Implicit Association Test to replicate the results of studies 1 and 2. Taken together, these studies show that low-SES groups are considered as animal-like whereas high-SES groups are seen as robot-like. We discuss the implications of these findings in relation to the justification of income inequality within our society.",
author = "Mario Sainz and Roc{\'i}o Mart{\'i}nez and Miguel Moya and Rosa Rodr{\'i}guez-Bail{\'o}n",
year = "2019",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/ijop.12485",
language = "English",
volume = "54",
pages = "423--430",
journal = "International Journal of Psychology",
issn = "0020-7594",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",
number = "4",

}

Animalizing the disadvantaged, mechanizing the wealthy : The convergence of socio-economic status and attribution of humanity. / Sainz, Mario; Martínez, Rocío; Moya, Miguel; Rodríguez-Bailón, Rosa.

In: International Journal of Psychology, Vol. 54, No. 4, 01.08.2019, p. 423-430.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Animalizing the disadvantaged, mechanizing the wealthy

T2 - The convergence of socio-economic status and attribution of humanity

AU - Sainz, Mario

AU - Martínez, Rocío

AU - Moya, Miguel

AU - Rodríguez-Bailón, Rosa

PY - 2019/8/1

Y1 - 2019/8/1

N2 - Differences between groups in socio-economic status (SES) are becoming more salient nowadays. In this context, we examined the animalistic and mechanistic dehumanization that both low and high-SES groups may experience respectively by conducting three studies. In study 1, we manipulated the SES of two fictitious groups (low vs. high-SES) and measured the humanity ascribed to them. Results showed that the low-SES group was animalized in comparison with the high-SES group, which was mechanized. In study 2, we manipulated the humanity of two fictitious groups by describing them as animals or machines and measured the perceived SES of the groups. Participants tended to attribute lower SES to the group described as animals and higher SES to the group described as machines. Finally, in study 3, we used an Implicit Association Test to replicate the results of studies 1 and 2. Taken together, these studies show that low-SES groups are considered as animal-like whereas high-SES groups are seen as robot-like. We discuss the implications of these findings in relation to the justification of income inequality within our society.

AB - Differences between groups in socio-economic status (SES) are becoming more salient nowadays. In this context, we examined the animalistic and mechanistic dehumanization that both low and high-SES groups may experience respectively by conducting three studies. In study 1, we manipulated the SES of two fictitious groups (low vs. high-SES) and measured the humanity ascribed to them. Results showed that the low-SES group was animalized in comparison with the high-SES group, which was mechanized. In study 2, we manipulated the humanity of two fictitious groups by describing them as animals or machines and measured the perceived SES of the groups. Participants tended to attribute lower SES to the group described as animals and higher SES to the group described as machines. Finally, in study 3, we used an Implicit Association Test to replicate the results of studies 1 and 2. Taken together, these studies show that low-SES groups are considered as animal-like whereas high-SES groups are seen as robot-like. We discuss the implications of these findings in relation to the justification of income inequality within our society.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045335445&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85045335445&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/ijop.12485

DO - 10.1002/ijop.12485

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85045335445

VL - 54

SP - 423

EP - 430

JO - International Journal of Psychology

JF - International Journal of Psychology

SN - 0020-7594

IS - 4

ER -